Principle 2: Structure the Board to Add Value

"Have a board of an effective composition size and commitment to adequately discharge its responsibilities and duties"

Recommendation 2.1: A majority of the board should be independent directors.

The Company currently has three directors, Neil Warburton, Mick Elias, Brett Young.

Details of these directors, including their skills, experience and terms of office are set out in the Company's annual report.
 
The Board has adopted a materiality threshold relating to a director's current or former association with a supplier, professional adviser or consultant to the Company. From the Company's viewpoint, material is more than 5% of the Company's total consolidated expenses for the relevant financial year.  From the director's viewpoint when assessing an association, material is more than 5% of the total revenue of the supplier, adviser or consultant as the case may be.
 
The substantial shareholder associated with Mr Warburton owns between 5% and 10% of the shares of the Company.  The Board does not consider that this will hinder his independent decision making.
 
The Board considers the make-up of the Board is appropriate given the Company's size and operations.  The effectiveness of the Board is achieved through knowledge and experience specific to the business and the industry in which it operates.
 
The Board has also adopted procedures intended to ensure that independent decision making occurs.  All directors are entitled to seek independent professional advice, at the Company's cost, in carrying out their duties, subject to the chairperson's prior approval of the expenditure, which will not be unreasonably withheld.  Further, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and policies adopted each member of the Board is required to keep the Board advised on an ongoing basis of any potential conflict of interest which may exist with the Company. If a conflict does exist, the director concerned must absent themselves from any Board discussion in relation to the relevant item and not vote upon such an item.  Non-executive directors are also encouraged to confer on a needs basis without management in attendance.

Recommendation 2.2: The chairperson should be an independent director.

The Company's chairperson, Neil Warburton, is not an independent director, as set out above in relation to best practice recommendation 2.1. However, due to his experience and expertise in the areas in which the Company operates and as a company director, the Board considers that Mr Liddell is highly appropriate to perform the role of chairperson.  This includes the leadership of the Board, organisation and conduct of its function and the briefing of directors on board matters.  The Board is confident that he is able to facilitate effective contributions from other directors. The Board does not consider that Mr Warburton's other directorships or chairmanships affect his ability to effectively perform these functions for the Company.

Recommendation 2.3: The roles of the chairperson and chief executive officer should not be exercised by the same individual.

The role of the Company's chairperson has been fulfilled by Neil Warburton, Brett Young holds the position of chief operating officer as well Company Secretary. The division of responsibility between the Company's chairperson and its chief executive officer is set out in the Statement of Board's Role, Functions and Responsibilities referred to in relation to best practice recommendation 1.

Recommendation 2.4: The board should establish a nomination committee.

The Board has not established a nomination committee as, due to the Company's size and its operations, the Board considers a separately established committee is not warranted and its functions and responsibilities can be adequately and efficiently discharged by the Board as a whole. The Board assesses the experience, knowledge and expertise of potential directors before any appointment is made and adheres to the principle of establishing a board comprising directors with a blend of skills, experience and attributes appropriate to the Company and its business. The main criterion for the appointment of directors is an ability to add value to the Company and its business. All directors appointed by the Board are subject to election by shareholders at the following annual general meeting of the Company.

Recommendation 2.5: Provide the information indicated in the ASX Corporate Governance Council's Guide to Reporting on Principle 2.

The Company has complied with providing the relevant information in this Statement including the procedure for the selection and appointment of new directors to the Board.

Email Subscription


Latest News
Mt Martin Optimisation Study Results 21 July 2010
The recently completed optimisation study has indicated that an open pit mine would make a significant profit with various treatment options producing 50,000 - 60,000 ozs of Au at a gold price of A$1,300/oz
Mt Martin Exploration Update 9 July 2010
Encouraging results have been received from recent drilling of East Shear North
exploration target which lies to the east of the main Mt Martin pit.
50% Increase in gold Resources at Mt Martin 25th June 2010
Australian Mines Limited (ASX:AUZ) is pleased to announce an increase of approximately 50% in gold resources at the Mt Martin mine.
Mt Martin Resource Definition Drilling Recommences June 2010
Australian Mines Limited (ASX:AUZ) is pleased to announce that surface drilling will recommence at Mt Martin on Monday 14th June 2010 to further define new resources at Mt Martin.
Mt Martin RC Drill Results East Lode Pit May 2010
Australian Mines Limited (ASX:AUZ) is pleased to announce very encouraging results from its latest RC drilling under the East Lode pit at the Mt Martin Project
Drilling Recommences at Mt Martin 20/04/10
AUZ Mines which announced encouraging results on 6th April from drilling its 100% owned Mt Martin gold project will be recommencing drilling this week.
Copyright © 2010 Australian Mines | Disclaimer | Privacy